and the horrible, horrible irony is that the tobacco industries research is world class and open to all as they try to be whiter than white and claw back some of their reputation, and its the *public health research* that is being shown again and again and again to be utterly woeful, full of holes, unrealistically set up, deliberately misleading, failing to compare harm etc yet still gets breathless front page press coverage *every* time it comes out, with no recourse for correction, even before its been formally peer reviewed or published in many cases
It can be a half-pack or a value pack, depending on the needs of consumers and government regulations
Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 45, 722-729
It affirmed this position in later decisions
16 As shown in figure 3.36.2 (as indicated by the darker bars), while reducing smoking decreased the risk of lung cancer, results for other health outcomes were mixed and often showed no benefit of cutting down