Australia responded that its measures were based on sound evidence, and that the available evidence confirmed that the Plain Packaging Measures were indeed contributing to their broader objective.[11] The panel sided with Australia, saying that the evidence before us, taken in its totality, supports the view that the TPP measures, in combination with other tobacco-control measures maintained by Australia (including enlarged GHWs introduced simultaneously with TPP), are apt to, and do in fact, contribute to Australias objective of reducing the use of, and exposure to, tobacco products.[12] Are the Measures Trade-Restrictive
with people with SUDs exhibiting a disproportionately high likelihood of dying from smoking-related causes
doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2787-9
federal government, gives broad ideas on sources to seek out, including cessation programs from local hospitals, health insurance companies, employers, and local health departments
24.0%) or e-cigarettes (29.8% vs